On October 15, 2023, who is the dominant leader in the field of 3D printing?


0

A Different Perspective on the Valuations of Major 3D Printing Companies

For those who closely follow the world of 3D printing, keeping track of the valuations of major companies in this industry is of utmost importance. By monitoring their market capitalization, which is calculated by multiplying the current stock price by the number of outstanding shares, we can gain insights into the overall financial health and potential of these companies. Understanding their valuation helps us gauge their capabilities, such as their ability to secure loans or embark on new projects. Market capitalization, or “market cap”, is a crucial factor in assessing the growth and prospects of these 3D printing businesses.

However, it’s worth noting that not all major players in the 3D printing industry are publicly traded, and therefore, the true size and value of some companies remain unknown to us. While publicly traded companies are required to disclose their financial reports and appear on stock markets, others, like EOS, operate privately. Moreover, conglomerates such as HP or Siemens have extensive 3D printing divisions, but their overall size and the scale of their 3D printing activities remain difficult to ascertain. Despite these limitations, we can focus our attention on the publicly traded 3D printing companies to gain insights into the industry as a whole.

Taking a closer look at this week’s valuations, there was a noticeable decline in the market capitalization of most companies on the leaderboard. This is peculiar considering that the overall stock markets experienced a slight upward trend during this period. 3D printing companies tend to reflect and amplify general market trends, making this decline even more unexpected. However, it’s important to remember that external events can often impact the valuation of companies, causing it to fluctuate. Hence, a weekly analysis of these valuations helps us track such developments and understand the underlying reasons.

At the top of the leaderboard, we witnessed a reshuffling of positions. Xometry, after briefly relinquishing the top spot to Stratasys, has reclaimed its position as the highest-valued 3D printing company. This reversal was due to Xometry’s valuation dropping slightly less than Stratasys this week, facilitating the change in rankings. While valuation fluctuations can occur for various reasons, it’s worth speculating on the factors behind this shift. It’s possible that investors no longer anticipate any major corporate moves for Stratasys, particularly since its proposed merger with Desktop Metal fell through and it rejected the latest offer from 3D Systems. Moreover, Stratasys’s headquarters in Israel, coupled with the recent conflict in Gaza, may have created some unease among investors, regardless of any direct impact on the company’s operations.

However, the most significant development to note is the remarkable drop in valuation for 3D Systems. As of this week, their market capitalization has plummeted to nearly US$500 million, a massive decline from their valuation of almost US$5 billion in June 2021. This represents a staggering drop of almost 90%, which has undoubtedly affected their takeover strategy for Stratasys. A significant portion of their bids was contingent on their stock price, and the substantial decrease in their valuation has likely impeded their plans.

Among the other players in the potential Stratasys takeover, Nano Dimension stands out. While their valuation also experienced a decline, it was relatively less severe compared to others, pushing them into third place on the leaderboard. Surprisingly, Nano Dimension now boasts a market capitalization that is 30% higher than that of 3D Systems. This shift in ranking underscores the dynamic nature of the 3D printing industry and the continually evolving landscape of competition.

Another notable player in the industry, FATHOM, has been experiencing a downward trend in its valuation, primarily driven by a recent reverse stock split. While reverse stock splits are often necessary for companies to maintain their presence on the stock market, they are generally perceived negatively by investors. This has likely contributed to the decline in FATHOM’s value.

In terms of upcoming companies, Essentium has attracted attention for its plans to launch on NASDAQ through a SPAC-merger. However, this deal has been suspended, leaving us eager to learn about the company’s next steps and the potential implications for its valuation.

Lastly, I have been closely monitoring ICON, a Texas-based construction 3D printer manufacturer. Although the company is privately held and not publicly traded, its significant fundraising efforts have caught my attention. ICON’s ability to secure substantial investments indicates a growing interest in the construction 3D printing sector and their potential for future growth.

In conclusion, even though it might not seem crucial to monitor the valuations of 3D printing companies on a weekly basis, these updates provide valuable insights into the industry’s health and potential areas of growth. Market capitalization serves as a pivotal metric to evaluate the progress and prospects of these companies. While this analysis focuses on publicly traded players, it’s important to acknowledge the presence of other significant 3D printing companies, both publicly traded and privately held, whose true sizes and valuations remain unknown. Understanding the dynamics and developments in the 3D printing industry can help investors, enthusiasts, and industry experts stay informed and make informed decisions.

Unlocking the Potential of the 3D Printing Industry

In the world of technology and innovation, one industry that has been making significant strides is 3D printing. This revolutionary manufacturing process is changing the game in numerous sectors, from healthcare to automotive and beyond. As the industry continues to flourish, it’s natural to wonder about the top players and their potential for growth.

One company that has been making waves in the 3D printing realm is VulcanForms. With its cutting-edge metal 3D printing process, the company has captured the attention of investors and industry experts alike. Currently, valued at over half a billion dollars, the company is on track to become a major player in the market. Considering its rapid growth, a transition to public markets seems like a logical step for VulcanForms. This move could not only solidify its position but also propel its valuation even higher.

While VulcanForms is undoubtedly a frontrunner in the industry, it’s worth noting that there may be other privately-held 3D printing companies with significant potential. These players, although not listed on any stock exchange, are still actively contributing to the advancement of 3D printing technology. Companies like EOS, Carbon, and Formlabs have been making their mark and may eventually join the ranks of major players in the industry.

However, it’s important to remember that not every company engaged in 3D printing can be classified as a major player. Some organizations may only have a small portion of their operations dedicated to 3D printing, making it unfair to include them in the list of top contenders. Nevertheless, these companies shouldn’t be disregarded, as their involvement in the industry still holds value.

As we continue to closely monitor the progress of publicly-traded 3D printing companies, it’s crucial to keep an eye on private entities that may be flying under the radar. Although their exact valuations may be unknown, their potential cannot be underestimated. If you have any insights on other notable 3D print companies, whether public or private, we encourage you to share them with us.

The 3D printing industry is evolving at an incredible pace, and only time will tell which companies will rise to the top. As we await the future, it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities for both established and emerging players in this game-changing field. Stay tuned for more updates, and don’t forget to share this post with fellow enthusiasts who are passionate about the future of 3D printing.

Original source

Source

“Why did the 3D printer go to therapy? Because it had too many layers of unresolved issues!”


Like it? Share with your friends!

0
GCode-Guru

Meet the mastermind behind NozzleNerds.com: GCode-Guru, a 3D printing wizard whose filament collection rivals their sock drawer. Here to demystify 3D tech with a mix of expert advice, epic fails, and espresso-fueled rants. If you've ever wondered how to print your way out of a paper bag (or into a new coffee cup), you're in the right place. Dive into the world of 3D printing with us—where the only thing more abundant than our prints is our sarcasm.

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Poll
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
List
The Classic Internet Listicles
Countdown
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Meme
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Video
Youtube and Vimeo Embeds
Audio
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF
Gif
GIF format