What is the implication of 3D Systems’ announcement about a major restructuring?

3D Systems is making headlines with its recent announcement of a “restructuring” initiative. While this term may sound innocuous, it is often code for “cutting costs” in the corporate world. In this case, 3D Systems aims to improve operating efficiencies and create long-term value by implementing a plan that is expected to deliver annualized savings of $45 – $55 million by the end of 2024. The majority of these cost savings will come from staff layoffs, which are likely to occur in the next few months.

The motivation behind this move seems to be the company’s soft revenue predictions for the near future. A company’s stock price reflects its expected profit, so if projected profits decrease, shareholders become unhappy and stock prices fall. To avoid this scenario and restore profitability, 3D Systems is cutting costs while maintaining its revenue targets.

This decision may not come as a surprise, given the significant decline in the company’s stock price and valuation over the past few months. In fact, 3D Systems is currently worth 64% less than it was in the summer. Such a decline naturally raises concerns among investors, prompting the company to take action.

Interestingly, this restructuring initiative also bears relevance to 3D Systems’ expired offer to acquire Stratasys. The offer included an estimated savings of around $100 million if the two companies were to merge. Strikingly, this amount is approximately double the savings projected through the current restructuring plan. One can’t help but wonder if the exploration of the merger potential uncovered significant cost-saving opportunities, which are now being pursued by 3D Systems independently.

Looking at the broader picture, the weak sales reported by 3D Systems may be indicative of a trend experienced by other 3D printer manufacturers. As evaluations of their financial results unfold, it is possible that other companies will follow suit and announce their own restructuring plans in the coming weeks. It is conceivable that 3D Systems had a head start due to its work on the Stratasys proposal.

In conclusion, 3D Systems’ restructuring initiative reflects the company’s determination to improve its financial outlook. By implementing cost-cutting measures, they aim to restore profitability while maintaining their revenue targets. The potential savings identified through the expired merger offer with Stratasys may have played a role in shaping this strategy. As the 3D printing industry endures challenging times, it will be interesting to observe how other companies respond and whether they will adopt similar restructuring plans.

Original source